The Structure of Intelligence by B. Goertzel
By B. Goertzel
Read or Download The Structure of Intelligence PDF
Best demography books
Partridge and Rickman discover the large geographic disparities in poverty around the usa. Their specialize in the spatial dimensions of U. S. poverty unearths targeted variations throughout states, metropolitan parts, and counties and leads them to think about why antipoverty guidelines have succeeded in a few areas and failed in others.
Demographers discover inhabitants variety within the usa.
English inhabitants heritage from relations Reconstitution is the second one a part of the one most vital demographic enquiry of the previous iteration, the 1st half being The inhabitants background of britain, 1541-1871. This learn proves that relatives reconstitution has been quite profitable in acquiring actual information regarding the demography of previous populations.
- New Pathways in Microsimulation
- Society and family strategy: Erie County, New York, 1850-1920
- Geodemographics, GIS and Neighbourhood Targeting (Mastering GIS: Technol, Applications & Mgmnt)
- Terrorism and Development: Using Social and Economic Development to Inhibit a Resurgence of Terrorism
- Land Use, Climate Change and Biodiversity Modeling: Perspectives and Applications
Additional resources for The Structure of Intelligence
Suppose that we are not dealing with Turing machines, but rather with "substitution machines" -- machines which are capable of running only programs of the form P(A,B,C)="Wherever sequence B occurs in sequence C, replace it with sequence A". Instead of writing P(A,B,C) each time, we shall denote such a program with the symbol (A,B,C). For instance, (1,10001,1000110001100011000110001) = 11111. (A,B,C) should be read "substitute A for B in C". e. %x%=%x%T , and the complexity %y% of a substitution program y as the number of symbols required to express y in the form (A,B,C).
G. Spencer-Brown has discovered a particularly poignant way of illustrating the implications of this logical peculiarity. Suppose, he says, that you have built a random number generator -- a machine which is intended to generate numbers in such a way that each number it generates has absolutely nothing to do with the others. Then how can you test it to see if it works? com 35 THE STRUCTURE OF INTELLIGENCE Suppose you tested it and it gave out a hundred zeros in a row. You would probably assume that it was broken.
Then you'd probably be confident its answers were random, since you're probably confident the results of a coin toss are random. But this is nothing more or less than intuition: you're assuming something is random because you haven't seen any structure to it in the past. An intuition is not the same as a theoretical guarantee. Essentially, this paradox arises from the assumption that a random number generator must give out every sequence of length n with equal frequency. But is there any other way to define a random number generator?