Origen Against Plato (Ashgate Studies in Philosophy & by Mark J. Edwards

By Mark J. Edwards

Origen (185-254) is considered one of many figures mainly chargeable for the illness of biblical theology with pagan philosophy within the early church. Edwards argues that Origen got down to build a Christian philosophy, but he did so with the goal of holding theology from the infiltration of pagan notion. interpreting the query of philosophical impact on Christian proposal, Edwards argues that students have usually leapt to unjustified conclusions dependent easily on universal vocabulary or parallel improvement. This booklet advances new interpretations of the early Christian platforms that are commonly known as "Gnostic", and the Doctrine of the Trinity in Origen's "Platonist" instructor Clement of Alexandria. Edwards concludes that Origen's hermeneutics, eschatology, cosmology and Trinitarian theology are all relating to his figuring out of human nature, that's greatly against that of Platonism.

Show description

Read or Download Origen Against Plato (Ashgate Studies in Philosophy & Theology in Late Antiquity) PDF

Best greek & roman books

Origen Against Plato (Ashgate Studies in Philosophy & Theology in Late Antiquity)

Origen (185-254) is thought of as one of many figures mainly accountable for the infection of biblical theology with pagan philosophy within the early church. Edwards argues that Origen got down to build a Christian philosophy, but he did so with the goal of protecting theology from the infiltration of pagan concept.

Aquinas on Metaphysics: A Historico-doctrinal Study of the Commentary on the Metaphysics

Thomas Aquinas' observation at the Metaphysics has lengthy been con­ sidered via many as the most attention-grabbing, such a lot lucrative of all his works. but surprisingly sufficient, there was no broad research of this paintings, at the least none that has ever reached print. it's within the wish of in part filling this hole in medieval study that the current research of the metaphysical method of the observation was once conceived.

Euripides and the Poetics of Sorrow: Art, Gender, and Commemoration in Alcestis, Hippolytus, and Hecuba

The place is the excitement in tragedy? this query, how discomfort and sorrow turn into the stuff of aesthetic pride, is on the heart of Charles Segal's new booklet, which collects and expands his fresh explorations of Euripides' artwork. Alcestis, Hippolytus, and Hecuba, the 3 early performs interpreted right here, are associated by way of universal subject matters of violence, demise, lamentation and mourning, and through their implicit definitions of female and male roles.

Additional info for Origen Against Plato (Ashgate Studies in Philosophy & Theology in Late Antiquity)

Sample text

Aristotle of course gives primacy to living things, and some reasons for his preference will be given in a later chapter. Here, however, I want to focus on what all sortals have in common, namely, that similar particulars are gathered together. That is, while admitting that for Aristotle only some kinds will be natural (with the result that their members are neither said of nor present in a subject), I want in this section to restrict attention to the features of kinds simply in virtue of their being kinds.

1031b28-30) If the thing and its essence are not the same, then its essence must itself be an individual and thus has itself to have an essence, which, because it is not the same as the essence of the thing, is itself another individual, and so on, resulting in regress. Read as an objection to Plato, this argument seems very strange; Aristotle has given us no reason to conclude that a Form and its essence are not identical. But Aristotle uses his argument to lead us to a different conclusion. The argument, he tells us, does not apply to Platonic Forms alone; each primary and self-subsistent thing is one and the same as its essence (1032a4-6; cf.

When Aristotle says in the Physics that only to things to be which is the same do all the 38 SUBSTANCE AND SEPARATION IN ARISTOTLE same properties belong (202bl5-16), his primary concern seems to be to explain away certain cases of referential opacity involving accidental sameness. Whether there are other cases of referential opacity - that is, whether his conditions are sufficient for substitutivity or only necessary - is a question that does not get asked. Yet it may be that it is answered nonetheless in Metaphysics VII 6.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.87 of 5 – based on 50 votes